Thursday, June 30, 2011

The Nature of Death

 This is one of the more philosophical portions I will do in this blog. This particular subject is rather a very sensitive one for many people. It is an analysis and discourse on the nature of death to me. The concept of death is a tricky and rather controversial topic due to the overwhelming religious battles over said concept. This makes it rather difficult to talk about.

 Death to me is a very layered experience. I have a couple of friends with near death experiences and I've read several testimonies on it on the internet and on news reals and many of them seem to be predominantly Christian. I'm going to go off on a tangent here; I am an atheist, but I'm not an empiricist. I do not follow in any of the standard doctrines of any Abrahamic Religions. I've studied World Religions for a very long time and even took a short course on it early sophomore year. Abrahamic Religions seem to dominate other religious values entirely rendering nearly any other religion virtually obsolete. Studying Eastern religions however, particular Buddhism, Hinduism, Taoism and so forth, I came across a broad realization: No one Religion is right, but all religions contain a piece of the truth.

Death to me like I said previously is a layered experience in the sense that there are many forms of Death. The most obvious one is the death of the body. This is where consciousness in the temporal world we live in ends, the body and brain (not mind) no longer functions and the body begins to deteriorate. This is the form of death that is most fearful to the human condition, mostly due to the uncertainty of what happens after. Another reason why it's fearful is because of the fear of separation from the loved one for an indeterminable amount of time, possibly eternally. But there is also a worse death; the death of the self.


The Self (capital "S") is the "spirit" or essence of that man. It is that man's ideas and through this he lives on in memories and hearts of others. To quote one of my favorite films and comic books "V for Vendetta": "Beneath this mask there is more than flesh. Beneath this mask is an idea and ideas are bulletproof." These ideas that people have, when they are conceived at the deepest levels of one's psyche with virtually no coercive influence from the outside, these are the purest thoughts a man can have. These are the thoughts that even lead to the conception of philosophy and to some degree, religion. These things immortalize a man. These things prevent the death of the True Self even long after the physical body has returned to Earth. However, the death of the Self is when one refuses to have and cultivate such thoughts. It's when a man seeks not to harness the Truer Self, but rather destroy it. We see this mentality manifest in various addictions, such as T.V., alcohol, drugs etc. These addictions are meant to separate someone from the Self. It distracts them and this conceives a social identity. I will cover this epistemological view in another post I tend to do soon, but the reason I brought it up is that it has a profound connection with Death on spiritual terms. When someone destroys the Self, which according to Soren Kierkegaard, is impossible and thus the essence of despair unto death, but when they die, in this world, they are no longer remembered. They are forgotten in the ravages of time, and that is when they truly die. Some even die before they actually physically perish.

 The saddest type of death to me, is not the death of the body or the death of the memory, but rather the death of the Principles. Many religious practitioners believe that the bible is the Divine foundation for Morality. I disagree. I believe that morality comes from discipline and mastery of the Self. That bit is heavily endorsed in Chinese philosophy and Martial Arts or Kung Fu. Morality is born when people bear a willing respect and reverence not for a deity or god, but a reverence, love and respect for humankind, both good and evil. True morality isn't condemning those who you deem are bad, but rather treating both good and bad people equally and loving them both. The saddest form of death is the oppression of  these ideals both on a social and worse, an individual level. The death of one's principles when said principles are obtained through long meditations (contemplation) and self examination is outstanding. Not only do you witness the death of an idea, but the death of the Self and the Selves of a social grouping, and that is truly saddening, because now the ideals and principles once endorsed by the person is not simply dead and remembered, but dead, remembered, and consequentially despised. This, in my opinion is True death, and anyone who suffers the death of these Principles (not principles from Religion or God, but personal principles and beliefs), then they are really nothing more than a walking corpse.

 As for literal death and discussions on the afterlife and metaphysical notions, I think I will discuss that on a later point in time when I feel I obtained the right words to express it without discrediting the belief fundamentally.

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Thoughts on Extraterrestial life

 A very dear friend of me asked me to give my opinion on the existence of extraterrestrial  life in the universe. I'll attempt to do this while ATTEMPTING to refrain from delving too deep into personally metaphysical notions, although it's almost inevitable that someone will ask me a metaphysical or ontological question quite soon so I'm preparing for that.

 To me personally, not believing in any extraterrestrial life is quite silly. I mean it's understandable in the belief that there is no evidence extraterrestrial life exists or has attempted to contact our world, despite the numerous conspiracy theories circulating in the mainstream. While it's not necessarily unreasonable to believe that the American government lies to it's people (which it obviously does), I want to state this logically.

 While being unable to give any tangible evidence to support my claim I will refer to my close friend, Logic. This universe on a macroscopic level is enormous with numerous planets in just our galaxy. Logically it's quite possible at the very least few of these contain extraterrestrial existence. Science points out that for life to form the planet at the very least has to be chemically similar to ours. While I don't deny this, I question why? Does life to exist and be intelligent like us REQUIRE the same conditions we did/do in order to sustain life? I find that notion a tad absurd. I believe that, evolution withstanding, that adaptation might be a common factor in the formation of life. The universe itself is constantly evolving and changing shape and form, so why shouldn't it's subjects do the same? So if adaptation holds true, I believe that there may be life forms or extraterrestrials that are able to adapt to unbelievable and otherwise inhospitable conditions of their own planet.

 I believe that my position and belief, if you can call it that, on this matter is quite reasonable. I don't expect anyone to endorse it but I want to talk about the lack of evidence. I believe the nation's officials and various political leaders more than likely censor the distribution of information to the general public which I find quite possible given that the existence of extraterrestrial life could be quite detrimental to the religious foundation particularly of this country and the world. A staggering 76% of American citizens are at least some form of Christian. 55% of American Christians are Creationists. Creationism is the teleological belief that God created the Universe and Humans  in some form. 33% believe evolution happened, but God oversaw the process. These I suppose are valid points of view on the ontology of the Universe, however I do carry my reserves for this that I will discuss in another post.

My belief is that any existence of the extraterrestrial lifeforms threatens the biblical foundation of these beliefs. In the bible it explicitly states in various instances that God created man in his likeness and the animals to provide for him. The existence of life else where could prove very detrimental to the Creationist theory. Therefore it isn't unreasonable to suggest that, given the overwhelming Christian majority in this nation, particularly within it's leadership, that they could in someway inhibit information and evidence from leaking out. That's just my take on extraterrestrial existence without diving head first into Metaphysics.

P.S. Irrelevant point, but I'd like to create a distinction between Metaphysical philosophy and it's New Age counterpart. Metaphysics is the study of being and it's nature. Metaphysical New Age belief systems tend to be less secular and more into the realm of extra-dimensional existence, astral travel, crystal healing and so on. Ergo, when I say metaphysics at any point in time without addressing otherwise, I'm referring purely to the Philosophical portion of Metaphysics.

Introduction: A world with Roses

 Hello everyone. I'm creating this blog essentially as a place where I can freely express my various and sometimes rather radical ideas and opinions as well as a discussion of philosophical notions or anything in which happens to catch my interest at any particular point in time. I was immediately inspired to do this upon the rather extensive political research I have conducted the past few days as well as tediously watching various segments of the O'Reilly Factor (Lol), which had led me to feel this need to form a political, religious, and philosophical opinion.

 While politics will certainly be one of the main topics I will discuss, I will also introduce and share my idea of what an ideal world is supposed to be. I will also explain various philosophical ideas I've had, not necessarily political, but around the areas mainly of Aesthetic value and judgement, epistemology and analysis, and of course ethics. I would go into metaphysics, but my metaphysical notions tend to insight some unusual conversations I will avoid metaphysics as much as I can. I will also leave it up to people who email me asking me a question or perhaps my views on a particular subject matter in which, I'd be more than happy to oblige.

 This is mainly for the fun of it; I enjoy discussing my views with various people and I feel putting up a blog on the internet is a rather interesting way to meet varying people, with diverse and sometimes intriguing things to say on the matters of politics and philosophy. For those of you, who enjoy the Matrix as I do and are curious of my interpretation of the Trilogy, please check out my other blog http//:www.matrixtrilogyinterpretations.blogspot.com, where I go into detailed length to discuss my philosophical and religious interpretations of the Trilogy. I'll try to update this blog regularly and I'll be sure to keep people posted. Till then, cheerio and remember:

                                                  Freedom Forever